Picture: RSA president, Cyril Ramaphosa
By OBAKENG MAJE
12 May 2026 – The defiant Republic of South Africa (RSA) president, Cyril Ramaphosa said in that judgment, the Constitutional Court found that certain aspects of the National Assembly rules that govern the process for the removal of the President from office are inconsistent with the Constitution. Ramaphosa said the judgment has given rise to much commentary, debate and speculation.
He further said there has been much concern and uncertainty in the country over the last few days following the delivery of the Constitutional Court Judgement. Ramphosa said when he assumed the office of President of the Republic of South Africa, he said that it was a responsibility that he would discharge with the greatest of care.
“I said that it was a responsibility that I would undertake mindful of the needs, aspirations and expectations of the people of this land. I pledged that I would serve you, the people of South Africa.
“I said that I would work with you, side by side, to build the South Africa that we all want and deserve. It is these undertakings that compel me to address you this evening. There have been calls from certain quarters calling on me to resign. At the same time, there have also been calls for me not to resign,” he said.
Ramphosa said the matter before the Constitutional Court arose from the report of an independent panel that was appointed by the National Assembly in September 2022 in terms of Section 89 of the Constitution to conduct a preliminary inquiry into certain allegations that had been made against him. He said these allegations related to a theft that took place at my farm in February 2020.
“The independent panel concluded that the information that was presented to it disclosed, prima facie, that the President may have committed serious misconduct and a serious violation of the Constitution.
“The Panel concluded that I, as the President, may have acted in a way that was inconsistent with my office and may have exposed myself to a situation involving a conflict between my official responsibilities and my private business,” said Ramaphosa.
He said on 13 December 2022, in accordance with its rules, the National Assembly voted not to refer the independent panel’s report to an impeachment committee that would consider the veracity and, where required, the seriousness of the charges contained in the motion. Ramphosa said the Constitutional Court has now ruled, on the basis of the flaw it found in the National Assembly rules, that the vote the National Assembly exercised on this matter in 2022 should be set aside.
“The Court has accordingly ordered that the report of the independent panel be referred to the Impeachment Committee of the National Assembly. In the judgment, the Constitutional Court declares that where the Panel recommends that a Section 89 inquiry be proceeded with, it must be implemented through a referral to an Impeachment Committee, “unless and until the Report is set aside on review”.
“I accept and respect the Constitutional Court’s ruling. I reiterate my firm commitment to the Constitution, the independence of the judiciary and the rule of law,” he said.
Ramphosa said since the judgment was handed down, he had reflected on what the judgment means for the country, for the rule of law and for the office that he occupies. He said he is mindful of the severe difficulties that the country is confronted with today.
“I am mindful of the need for stability at this time more than any other. At times of such uncertainty and contestation, our Constitution remains our guide. The drafters of the Constitution provided a clear, carefully considered process to deal with allegations of serious misconduct and a serious violation of the Constitution against a President.
“They foresaw that it would be necessary to provide recourse in the event that these allegations could be established, while at the same time protecting against spurious or malicious agendas,” said Ramphosa.
He said since a criminal complaint was laid against him in June 2022, he has consistently maintained that he has not stolen public money, committed any crime nor violated his oath of office. Ramphosa said from the beginning, he said that he would cooperate with all institutions that are mandated to deal with these types of matters.
“I have indeed cooperated with all investigations and enquiries into the matter. And I will continue to cooperate with all institutions that are mandated to deal with these matters.
“When the independent panel submitted its report in December 2022, I said that I disagreed with its findings and the process of reasoning that led to those findings. In my submission to the panel, I said the complaints against me are based on hearsay allegations,” he said.
Ramphosa said there was no evidence, let alone sufficient evidence, to prove that he committed any violation, let alone a serious violation of the Constitution or law, or serious misconduct as set out in the Constitution. He said as a consequence, he decided then to approach the courts to take the report of the independent panel on review.
The Guardian 