By OBAKENG MAJE
Some community members classified the situation at the embattled Greater Taung Local Municipality (GTLM), as being at medium risk for deterioration. This comes after the suspended Director of Corporate Services, Dikagisho Mokoma returned to work without facing any disciplinary hearing.
Mokoma was implicated in the Matshego Ramagaga Attorneys’ findings. The independent law firm was appointed by the municipality to investigate allegations of misconduct against Mokoma after she allegedly misled the previous council on danger allowance for the COVID-19 pandemic.
This resulted in the municipality ‘illegally’ paying senior managers and directors a monthly R2500 as danger allowance, instead of a standard flat rate of R1500.
According to the Magagane report, the municipality has lost R508 500 due to Mokoma’s alleged conduct.
Now, community activist, Benjamin Mashuga said there is a grim reality in the municipality, which is a direct result of municipal mismanagement. Mashuga further said the future of the residents looks bleak if the municipality is not going to be guided by the Municipal System Act.
“As members of the community, we have been attending council meetings as observers. So, we know that there was a council resolution that agreed to suspend Mokoma pending investigation.
“What surprises us is that she is back at work, while there is no council resolution that took that decision. The Municipal Structure Act 17 of 1998, Section 5, talks about the rights and duties of community,” he said.
Mashuga added that, they need answers and to see if the municipality is being run accordingly. He said it will be only fair for them to be furnished with municipal council resolution including the recordings of the meeting that agreed upon to bring Mokoma back to work.
“We also want the attendance register of all those councillors, who attended the meeting and took that resolution. However, the response that we got from the acting municipal manager, Andrew Makuapane Makuapane is not satisfactory.
“Firstly, he said there was a resolution, but when we asked him to refurbish us with it, he said we should write to the council. According to the law, if the council has taken a resolution on anything, that document becomes available for public consumption,” said Mashuga.
He also alleged that, Mokoma’s disciplinary hearing was not conducted timeously to allow her to go back to work without facing any disciplinary hearing.
Meanwhile, the GTLM mayor, Tumisang Gaoraelwe said: “Initially, Mokoma was not disciplined accordingly. There is a regulation that outlines how to hire and fire Section 56 and 57 managers. So, her suspension was irregular.
“Mokoma has returned to work even though is not official at the level of the council. The Magagane report was tabled before the council, but it was deferred. So, the council has never sat and entertained that report.”
Gaoraelwe said, however, if there is a need for Mokoma to be disciplined, that must be procedural.
“Only municipal council can discipline Section 56 and 57 managers. So, the status quo is, she is back at work and she was not even supposed to be disciplined anyway.
“The municipal manager cannot discipline Section 56 and 57 managers outright,” said Gaoraelwe.
On the other hand, the opposition parties in the municipality, have opened a fraud case against Mokoma. The North West police spokesperson, Brig Sabata Mokgwabone said, the case is still under investigation.