Moeletsi: SA becoming de-industrialised


MMbeki

South Africa is being de-industrialised and turned into a welfare state because of an alliance between the black political elite and the poor, political economist Moeletsi Mbeki said on Thursday.

“There is an alliance between the black middle class and the poor, this tells you how the poor are being bought off… they are grant recipients,” said Mbeki, who is former president Thabo Mbeki’s brother.

He was delivering a lecture: “What has the ANC achieved in nearly two decades?” at the University of the Witwatersrand.

“There are two primary political controllers of South Africa. The under-class are the single largest voting block of South Africa,” he said.

Political power rested between the black political elite and the black poor.

Mbeki said there was something wrong with the way the political elite was managing South Africa. It was the political elite which determined how the country developed.

“There is something very wrong with South Africa… with how the political elite are managing South Africa,” he said.

Under the ANC, three social groups had emerged.

They were: the capitalists or bourgeoisie, the political elite or bureaucratic bourgeoisie, and the under-class or unemployed.

“We have a unique political system in South Africa. It’s controlled by the black middle class (political elite), but it has an alliance with the poor or the under-class,” Mbeki said.

The objective of the political elite was to maximise consumption of the black middle class and to retain the monopoly on political power.

However, its weakness was that it depended on the vote of the under-class, which did not own productive assets, he said.

“The ANC has been driving a consumer revolution at the expense of production.”

Mbeki said the political elite’s private consumption was being funded by state revenue and had become a burden on taxpayers.

“It’s becoming clear where the bottleneck sits and where the problems are,” he said.

“The consumption of the black elite is unsustainable and has to be reversed.”

The capitalists needed to be brought into the loop. This group of society was defending itself by moving capital out of South Africa, said Mbeki.

“We need a new politics in South Africa, a more inclusive politics, not just a black elite and a black poor.”

“As long as they (capitalists) are out of the political loop, we’ll never have economic growth. They control the productive assets of the country,” he said.

In 2007, more than US20 billion (about R166.7bn), which was 20 percent of the gross domestic product (GDP), was moved out of South Africa by these capitalists.

“When you moving 20 percent of the GDP out of the country there is no way of developing your country,” he said.

Mbeki said the solution for South Africa was to develop entrepreneurs who were productive, and to develop science, maths, engineering and management education.

“Without that, we’re going nowhere.” – Sapa

ANC advocate to return after breakdown


IOL pic may24 jacob zuma

Related Stories

 

Advocate Gcina Malindi was expected to return to court to continue argument over whether artist Brett Murray’s painting should be banned, after breaking down in court on Thursday.

“He’s fine. He will be back to proceed,” said Malindi’s instructing attorney, Titus Mchunu.

After a gruelling morning of questioning in the High Court in Johannesburg on why there was a racial overtone to the painting, featuring genitals on a likeness of President Jacob Zuma, and whether the image could actually be banned given its wide distribution on the internet, witnesses said they saw Malindi slump in his chair and cry.

Judge Neels Claassen immediately adjourned, and word was later sent to the court that the case would resume at 2pm.

The ANC, Zuma, and Zuma’s children made an urgent application to have the painting “The Spear” removed before it was defaced on Tuesday. They also want City Press to remove images of it from its website.

They argue it infringes Zuma’s dignity as an individual and as president of the ANC and the country. City Press has refused to remove the painting, citing freedom of expression. – Sapa


‘It was my spoilt ballot paper’


iol news pic zuma pic defaced caught

Related Stories

The smearing of the painting depicting President Jacob Zuma with his genitals exposed was a political statement, one of two men accused of defacing the work said at the Johannesburg Regional Court on Wednesday.

“It was my spoilt ballot paper,” the man, 58, said as he waited to appear in court on a charge of malicious damage to property.

He allegedly made two large red crosses on the painting, one over Zuma’s genitals, another over his head.

He said he did not know the other man accused of smearing black paint over the work, and that he only met him after they were both arrested.

The man said it was not about art, but rather a political issue which had become a race issue. He would only comment in detail later about his actions.

George Moyo, who appeared earlier at the Hillbrow Magistrate’s Court after allegedly attempting to spray paint the word “respect” on a wall of the Goodman gallery, was at the Johannesburg Regional Court to show his support for the two accused men. – Sapa

Zuma painting: Accused gets R1 000 bail


Johannesburg – The man who allegedly tried to spray paint the word “respect” on the wall of the Goodman Gallery was granted bail in Hillbrow Magistrate’s Court on Wednesday. 

George Moyo was granted R1 000 bail and would return to court on June 14. He was charged with malicious damage to property.

When he was apprehended the letters “res” had been sprayed onto the white wall.

He was the third person to be arrested after Brett Murray‘s painting The Spear was defaced on Tuesday. 

Two men painted over the canvas depicting President Jacob Zuma with his genitals hanging out.

A full bench of the South Gauteng High Court would hear an application by the ANC on Thursday to have the painting removed.

Artist: Zuma painting not intended to hurt


brett murray

By Zara Nicholson and Baldwin Ndaba

Related Stories

Cape Town artist Brett Murray has spoken out for the first time about his controversial portrait, The Spear – which depicts President Jacob Zuma with his genitals exposed – saying he did not intend to cause any “hurt or to harm the dignity of any person”.

The artist said the work was “an attempt at humorous satire of political power and patriarchy within the context of other artworks in the exhibition and within the broader context of South African discourse”.

In a responding affidavit to Zuma’s application to have the portrait taken down, the owner of the Goodman Gallery, Liza Esser, included a statement from Murray. Until now, he has been silent on the divisive debate.

“In the apartheid years, I created satirical images which attacked abuses of power. For many years I have used, and continue to use, symbols with sexual connotations representative of political power and patriarchy,” Murray said.

Last week Zuma filed an urgent application in the Johannesburg High Court for an order to have the gallery remove the portrait as well as the City Press newspaper remove images of it from its website.

Both have refused, saying this would be censorship.

The matter will be heard on Tuesday.

 

In his affidavit, Zuma said the portrait infringed on his constitutional rights to dignity and privacy.

Zuma said he had felt “shocked, personally offended and violated” when he saw a copy of The Spear for the first time.

He said it depicted him as “a philanderer, a womaniser and one with no respect”.

Murray added: “I continue to create artworks which attack abuses of power and corruption through satire and parody in the exercise of my right to freedom of artistic expression under section 16 of the constitution.” He said the portrait was a parody of the well-known image of Lenin.

Murray said he was affirming his right to express himself artistically without fear or favour.

In her affidavit, Esser said she was opposing the application on the basis that the gallery was known as a neutral space “that embraces voices of dissent, presenting work that confronts the contemporary socio-political climate”.

 

She admitted that Zuma had a right to express his opinion of The Spear and accepted that he might well be outraged by the work.

Esser said the gallery had no intention to cause him or his family any “hurt or offence”.

The Star