Newly-elected SGB members welcomed


Pic: (North West MEC Matsemela welcomes newly-elected SGB members)

Pic: (North West MEC Matsemela welcomes newly-elected SGB members)

MAHIKENG- The North West Department of Education and Sports Development held a School Governing body inauguration event on Friday, 24 July 2015 at the Convention Centre to congratulate and motivate parents for taking part in the elections which took place in all public schools of Bokone Bophirima from 6 – 28 March 2015.

These elections have seen 16 473 SGB members elected into SGB structures in 1 536 schools and the theme that guided the elections was “Unity is Strength”.

MEC Wendy Matsemela noted that the department entrusts the SGBs with the responsibility of developing and adopting school policies which provide direction in managing school finances and resources.

The MEC said, “Despite massive financial injection in the education system and training provided, the department is not performing as expected as shown by some of the challenges experienced. To name a few: Underperformance of some schools, personal interest vs good governance, potholes in some classrooms, falling ceilings in some schools, broken windows and furniture”.

She further added, “Irrespective of all the challenges facing our schools, we garner strength from the words of Tata Mandela “It always seems impossible until it’s done” and remembering that “Without education, your children can never really meet the challenges they will face. So it’s very important to give children education and explain that they should play a role for their country”.

In closing MEC Matsemela discouraged in strongest terms the signing of blank cheques by the members of School Governing Bodies. She said, the signing of blank cheques is tantamount to corruption and parents must read documents thoroughly before signing.

The event was attended by well over 3 000 representatives from various schools across the province. There was a question and answer session where representatives highlighted their plight to which the MEC gave fruitful responses.`

-TDN

Follow us on Twitter@Taung_DailyNews or @IceT_

North West MEC condemns illegal hunting in Ganyesa


 DSC_5026

BY OBAKENG MAJE
Mahikeng- MEC Manketsi Tlhape for the Department of Rural Environment and Agricultural Development condemns and rejects with all the strongest and possible terms the alleged illegal hunting activities reported to be mushrooming in the area of Ganyesa.

This comes in a wake of a myriad of reports and outcries by farmers in the area of Ganyesa brought to the attention of the department. The matter is referred to South African Police services for further investigations and actions on perpetrators of such unbecoming activities and behaviour in the province.

“The hunting permits of the hunters who are allegedly reported to be hunting outside designated areas, have been revoked with immediate effect. Any further activities by these hunters both inside and outside the set boundaries in the area must be perceived to be as unlawful and warrant immediate arrest.” said the MEC.

On annual basis, MEC publishes in the Provincial Notice of the Government Gazette, regulations pertaining to the hunting of identified non-exempted game species on private, government and community owned land, and the hunting of identified bird species in the North West Province as well procedures for the granting of licenses, permits and fees in respect thereof in terms of- 1.1 Sections 17 and 102(1)(i) of the Nature Conservation Ordinance, No. 12 of 1983 (Transvaal Province);

1.2 Section 10, 29(i(b) and 29(i)(k) of the Bophuthatswana Nature Conservation Act, 1973, and
1.3 Sections 78(a)(i), 79(a)(i) and 82(i)(o) of the Cape Nature and Environmental Conservation Ordinance, No. 19 of 1974 (Cape Province),

In addition to the above, the MEC determines the number of plain game species and game bird species for annual take off as bag limits and hunting quota to be assigned to a particular hunting area including tribal lands under specific tribal authorities.

“Such hunting, when controlled and conducted in a sustainable manner, plays a crucial role in ensuring long term benefits to our previously disadvantaged communities, and thus such control is ensured by means of permits and licences that the department, as the issuing authority, issues in accordance to allocated hunting quota and bag limits, to tribal authorities for further issuance to their clients,” she said.

Tlhape said the permits and licenses herein referred to are those known to be face value permits, meaning that, tribal authorities (land owners) when in receipt of such permits in accordance to the hunting quota and bag limits, are able to further issue them to their end-user clients (hunters) at a fee for hunting to be conducted by those end-users; and details of the hunter (end-user), number of species to be hunted, details of the hunting vehicle/s, fire-arms and their calibres, as well the validity of the hunting permission for the hunt must be completed by the land-owner prior to commencement of the hunt, and further after the hunt is successful, the hunter and tribal ranger who accompanies and monitor the hunt in order to cancel further use of such permit must sign off the permit or licence.

“Land owners and hunters must at all times comply to conditions appended on the back of each permit or license, failure which enforcement measures including criminal prosecution would be imposed, and none of the above mentioned permits and licenses do allow the hunting at night (culling) for which a special permit is required, nor hunting on other land than those stated in a permit,” she said.

Land owners and all Tribal Authorities who are allocated who is allocated hunting quota, and hunting permits for further issuance to their identified hunters, must ensure at all times that such hunts are conducted within prescripts and are accompanied by relevant tribal ranger/s to ensure compliance.

A report, in a form of complaint was received sometimes last week to the effect that some tribal members around Ganyesa areas, were hunting illegally on private properties belonging to neighbouring farmers, and alleged that the hunts were carried out outside the stipulated of jurisdiction.

Above such allegations, an impression was also made in linking the illicit conduct of the hunters on the ground to the presumed incorrect issuing of permits by the department.

“Investigations have been conducted on the matter with the intention of finding lasting solutions. It is in the light of this that the Department took decisive steps in ensuring conformity to the law. In a quest of finding lasting solutions and conforming to the law, the department has instantly withdrawn the permits from the hunters perceived to be involved in the illegal hunting activities in the area.

“This was done after thorough investigation and following due processes. The outcome of the investigation indicates that no permits were issued incorrectly and that none of those permits could be attributed to the cause of the prevailing criminal activities,” said Tlhape.

She also outlines that in the light of this, the department took a decisive step to withdraw all the hunting permits issued to the particular Authority, this to avoid further misuse of the permits by criminals. This was done after thorough investigations and following due processes.
-TDN
Follow on Twitter@Taung_DailyNews or @IceT_

MEC’s trail of credit card sprees exposed


mec Mmemezi

By BALDWIN NDABA

Related Stories

Gauteng MEC for Local Government and Housing Humphrey Mmemezi has lied again and again to the provincial legislature.

He told the legislature he had spent more than R38 000 for accommodation in Malaysia, paying the Prince Hotel Residence in Kuala Lumpur R38 640 for his seven-day stay there while on an official state visit.

In March, DA spokesman on local government and housing Fred Nel had asked Mmemezi:

* How many nights did the MEC stay in hotels in 2011?

* What was the total cost of these hotel stays?

* What hotel did he stay in?

* In each case, how much was spent on each stay at each of the hotels?

* In each case, what was the justification for staying at each hotel?

* How was the payment made?

Mmemezi replied to the DA on May 18 that he had spent 47 nights in hotels in the past year, and

gave a breakdown of all the hotels and the money he had spent.

Mmemezi claimed he had used his credit card to settle his R38 640 bill.

However, The Star has seen Mmemezi’s corporate cardholder statement for December last year, and it does not reflect such a payment.

His government-issued credit card was the one used in Malaysia, with Mmemezi spending less than R650 on it for food. He spent R226.54 at the Bumbu Desa restaurant and later R396 at Nando’s Chickenland on December 7.

These were the only items listed on his credit card for December 2011.

The Star asked Mmemezi for proof of the R38 640. This was not forthcoming.

The credit card was used inside SA on the same day, December 10, that he should have been in Malaysia.

The following were a list of some of the things Mmemezi spent money on while he was in the country at the same time he was supposedly overseas, according to his claim:

* He spent R1 472.60 at Nando’s Umhlanga, near Durban;

* The next day, December 11, he spent R2 950 at Augusta Spur in Umhlanga Ridge;

* On December 12, Mmemezi spent R3 360 at Moyo UShaka pier in Durban;

* On December 16, he bought groceries at Bonanza Spar in Krugersdorp worth R202.08;

* Three days later, he spent R159 at Bates Service Station in Port Shepstone;

* On December 23 he bought groceries worth R98.29 at Rhino Cash & Carry in Mthatha; and

* On Christmas Eve he bought groceries at Myezo Spar, also in Mthatha, worth R387.17.

These were the only listed expenses for December last year.

Mmemezi had claimed to the legislature that on September 16 to 18 he had been booked at Irene Country Lodge near Pretoria. He said he had used his credit card to pay R3 430 for his stay.

This is contradicted by his credit card statement, which places him in Durban’s Shelly Beach earlier on September 18 – where he spent R697 at the Georgia Spur.

Later that night, he made an overnight booking at Irene Country Lodge and the lodge charged him R245 for his stay.

Mmemezi claimed that from October 7 to 9, he was booked at the Irene Country Lodge and the government was billed R15 070, but The Star has seen a bill showing Mmemezi was charged only R245 for his overnight stay on October 8.

Mmemezi had told the legislature in response to a question that from August 29 until September 1 last year, he had paid R4 629 for staying at the Protea Hotel Edward in Durban, but his credit card indicates otherwise. The statement The Star has seen indicates that Mmemezi had made an overnight booking at the Beach Hotel in Durban only on August 31.

He also claimed that between September 1 and 2 he had been booked at the Sheraton Hotel in Pretoria, but there is nothing supporting his version in his credit card statement.

Gauteng Local Government and Housing chief director, communications, Victor Moreriane declined to comment on The Star’s individual questions. He said Mmemezi would respond to questions in the legislature.

Premier Nomvula Mokonyane’s office referred queries to Mmemezi.

Mokonyane’s spokesman, Xoli Mngambi, said: “The level of detail you’re looking for would not… be kept in the Premier’s Office. The premier has requested a formal response from the MEC on the matters that you’re enquiring about. Upon receipt of MEC Mmemezi’s formal reply, the premier will make a determination.”

The ANC in Gauteng has asked that the matter be referred to the Office of the Integrity Commissioner of the Gauteng legislature for investigation.

 

Trade union Nehawu called for Mmemezi’s temporary suspension and a probe over the “very disturbing” allegations.

 

The Star