By BAKANG MOKOTO
23 January 2025- The Democratic Alliance (DA) said they strongly reiterate its opposition to the Expropriation Bill, which the Republic of South Africa (RSA) president, Cyril Ramaphosa has now signed into law. The DA said while they recognise that the constitution allows for acts of redress and restitution, including land reform, they have serious reservations about the procedure, as well as important substantive aspects of the Bill.
The DA national spokesperson, Willie Aucamp said: “We are in discussions with our legal team to formulate our case.”
Meanwhile, Ramaphosa spokesperson, Vincent Mangwenya said the president has signed into law the Expropriation Bill, which repeals the pre-democratic Expropriation Act of 1975, and sets out how organs of state may expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons. Magwenya further said the Bill, which has undergone a five-year process of public consultation and parliamentary deliberation, aligns legislation on expropriation with the constitution.
“Section 25 of the Constitution recognises expropriation as an essential mechanism for the state to acquire someone’s property for a public purpose or in the public interest, subject to just and equitable compensation being paid.
“Up to now, expropriation of property has been governed in terms of the Expropriation Act of 1975, which predates the expropriation mechanism provided for in section 25(2) of the Constitution,” he said.
Mangwenya added that the Bill assented to by Ramaphosa, outlines how expropriation can be done and on what basis. He said this law will assist all organs of state – local, provincial and national authorities – to expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons.
“Local, provincial and national authorities will use this legislation to expropriate land in the public interest for varied reasons that seek, among others, to promote inclusivity and access to natural resources.
“The Bill repeals the Expropriation Act and provides a common framework in line with the constitution to guide the processes and procedures for expropriation of property by organs of state,” said Magwenya.
He said in terms of this law, an expropriating authority may not expropriate property arbitrarily or for a purpose other than a public purpose or in the public interest. Magwenya said expropriation may not be exercised unless the expropriating authority has without success attempted to reach an agreement with the owner or holder of a right in property for the acquisition thereof on reasonable terms.
“An expropriating authority is therefore obliged to enter into negotiations with the owner of a property required for such purposes.
“An expropriating authority must also attempt to reach an agreement on the acquisition of the property before resorting to expropriation – except in circumstances where the right to use property temporarily is taken on an urgent basis in terms of a provision in the legislation,” he said.
Magwenya said the law provides for disputes to be referred for mediation or to appropriate courts.
The Guardian 