VUT autonomy compromised – EFF


Johannesburg – The institutional autonomy of the Vaal University of Technology (VUT) is compromised after it retracted an agreement it had with the EFF, the party said on Monday.

“The Economic Freedom Fighters condemns VUT’s withdrawal of its decision to give EFF a venue for its national people’s assembly taking place in December this year,” spokesperson Mbuyiseni Quintin Ndlozi said in a statement.

“VUT has retracted its agreement to give this venue to the EFF even after taking a deposit of R250 000 and taking the EFF leadership on a site visit for proper landscape planning.”

VUT spokesperson Mike Khuboni said the EFF’s allegations were inaccurate, as the university would not have accepted the money without the venue being confirmed.

“I remember the EFF representative who came to me to request the venue. The gentleman, he wanted the venue during the time when the university is closed,” Khuboni said.

“What we mentioned to him that normally the university, when it closes, there are no people who provide services such as cleaning, toiletries, security,… everything as required.”

With there being no university officials on campus at that time, the VUT could not let out the venue.

“We don’t hire venues out to the community when the university is closed because there is no staff available to adequately manage the venue. That was the main reason,” he said.

“We asked him to bring forward the conference, to say early December, just before the university closes, then the venue would be available. They [the EFF] declined that request.”

He said the VUT offered venues to whoever needed them because the community had the right to use them, and if the university could not provide a venue, it suggested alternatives.

Ndlozi said the VUT was under direct administration by the higher education department, and as such, was taking political instruction to deny the EFF access to its campus.

“This is despite the fact that the management has already, rightly, given the EFF a venue to hold its people’s assembly, thus compromising its institutional autonomy and academic independence,” he said.

“[The] VUT, by closing its ranks simply to satisfy the bully tactics of the ANC, has ceded its rights to institutional autonomy and rendered itself a mere ANC branch.”

The EFF had already spent millions of rands on merchandise and other conference material believing it had reached an agreement with the VUT.

“EFF will, therefore, take the university to court and make sure that the venue is given back for the people’s assembly,” Ndlozi said.

Should the venue not be given back to the EFF, the party would also go through the courts to ensure the money spent on merchandise and conference materials was fully replaced by the VUT, as it bore its name.

SAPA

Nel tries to discredit Oscar defence witness


Pretoria – Prosecutor Gerrie Nel tried to discredit two of the witnesses called by Oscar Pistorius’s defence in sentencing procedures in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on Monday.
For more http://www.news24.com

What sentence will Oscar Pistorius get?


What kind of sentence will Oscar Pistorius get for killing his girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp?

Judge Thokozile Masipa has wide latitude in deciding the sentence after several days of legal arguments and testimony that begin today.

Last month she convicted the double-amputee runner of culpable homicide, or negligent killing.

Sentences for such a crime can range from a suspended sentence and a fine to as many as 15 years in prison.

Pistorius was charged with premeditated murder in a televised trial that transfixed many people around the world, but Masipa found him not guilty of that charge.

She drew criticism from some South Africans who thought Pistorius could at least have been convicted of a lesser murder charge on the grounds that he knew a person could die when he fired four bullets through a toilet door in his home early on Valentine’s Day last year.

Steenkamp, a 29-year-old model, died in the hail of bullets, and prosecutors said Pistorius had opened fire in anger after the couple argued.

The runner testified that he mistook Steenkamp for an intruder who was about to come out of the toilet and attack him.

Lawyers vary widely in predictions about what kind of sentence Pistorius will get.

Some say he is unlikely to go to jail because defense lawyers will successfully argue that the athlete is a first-time offender with a disability that would subject him to particular hardship in prison, while others anticipate that Pistorius will be sentenced to some prison time because of the severity of his crime.

“I think that the probabilities are that the judge will send him to prison for a certain period, but not a very long one,” said George Bizos, a human rights lawyer. He did not specify the length of a possible jail term.

There are “clear aggravating and mitigating factors” that could influence the judge’s decision-making but that it was difficult to accurately predict the penalty because the “sentencing law is so individually applied”, said Kelly Phelps, a senior lecturer in the public law department at the University of Cape Town.

There are, however, past culpable homicide sentences that provide some context for the Pistorius case.

Singer Molemo “Jub Jub” Maarohanye’s murder conviction was overturned and replaced with a culpable homicide conviction last week, dropping his prison sentence from 25 to eight years.

He was arrested after a 2010 drag race in which he and his co-accused Themba Tshabalala ploughed cars into a group of schoolchildren, killing four and seriously injuring two.

In a separate case, taxi driver Jacob Humphreys’ murder conviction was also reduced to culpable homicide last year, cutting his prison time to eight years instead of 20 years.

His car had hit a train, and 10 children died in the accident.

– Sapa-AP