A Nort West community wanting to break away from its traditional leaders, was on Thursday given permission to hold meetings that could possibly lead to the unseating of their leader.
The Constitutional Court on Thursday set aside an interdict granted against Mmuthi Pilane and Ramoshibudu Dintwe by the North West High Court, which prohibited them from holding community meetings without its permission. The two men had applied for leave to appeal against the interdict.
The case arises from a dispute between the community of Motlhabe village and the Traditional council of the Bakgatla-Ba-Kgafela, an organisation that rules over 32 villages in the North West. Pilane and Dintwe, representing the Motlhabe residents had expressed dissatisfaction with the council’s administration and leadership. They were appointed a community headman and called themselves Bakgatla-Ba-Kautlwale.
In 2010, they called a community meeting where a discussion on removing their chief John Pilane would take place.
However, the council took the matter to court and interdicted them from calling or holding the meeting, arguing that the two had no authority to do so and asked that they refrain from using the Bakgatla-Ba-Kautlwale title as they were not royals.
In the ConCourt judgment delivered yesterday, Justice Thembile Skweyiya found that the high court had erred in granting the interdict because the two titles were different.
“The interdict effectively prevents the applicants from using terminology that is descriptive of their identity as a people. “It appears that the names ‘Bakgatla-Ba-Kautlwale’ and ‘Bakgatla-Ba-Motlhabe’ in themselves are not necessarily synonymous with a form of authority nor, on the applicants’ version, do they purport to be.
“Rather, they appear to be signifiers of the applicants’ ancestral lineage and their place of settlement,” he said.
The land ruled upon by the council included various mining areas and the holiday destination Sun City.
Although Mmuthi Pilane and John Pilane are brothers, there is a dispute between them over who is the rightful chief.
“I have taken notice of the fact that numerous matters of a similar nature involving the respondents have appeared before the courts.
“Resolving the present matter is also in the interests of justice as it will provide clarity on the rights of people living in the Traditional Community and in traditional communities more generally. I consider there to be prospects of success. For these reasons, I am of the view that it is in the interests of justice to grant leave to appeal,” said the judge.
Eight ConCourt judges supported Skweyiya while the chief justice Mogoeng Mogoeng and justice Bess Nkabinde wrote a dissent saying they would have come to a different conclusion.
For more details go to http://www.thenewage.co.za







